Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 20

According to the provisions of the UCC, Dan has a right to enforce the promissory note against Alpha since section 403.

In particular, the inclusion of the equal pay provision in the EU treaty, the EU equal pay directive, the European Court of Justice case law, and more recently, the inclusion of social equality principles in [...]

A key question that many would want to be answered is which of the two superior to the other. Essentially, this approach is much more superior when it comes to the deterrence of criminals.

The term preponderance of the evidence means that the side that would provide greater evidence concerning the case would lead either the judge or the jury to take one side as opposed to the other.

The report explores the UAE labor laws and compares them with the ILO standards and recommendations to showcase the need for legislative changes in the current UAE labor laws.

The organization decides on the number of hours the employees are supposed to work on a daily basis and allows them to attend to their duties at their most appropriate time.

The congress of the United States has a responsibility of enacting the 'Employee Free Choice Act which would greatly solve the problems experienced in the US labor laws that have limited the ability of employees [...]

The increased taxes on alcoholic beverages discouraged the consumption of alcohol, as a way of promoting the health of the citizens.

The case between the people and the king of pop, Michael Jackson, elicited two main ethical concerns: the passion of the prosecutor to convict the defendant and the possibility of the prosecutor to be an [...]

If Chris decides to move the funds from the customer to finance the deficit in the ledger, then it is also an example of a white-collar crime.

In regard to the relationship between the effect of various factors involved in a child's upbringing and the likelihood of becoming a criminal during adulthood, varied findings were made.

It is evident that the evolution of standards that the court has adopted to evaluate the freedom of expression leaves a lot to be desired. The court has attempted to define the role of the [...]

S 643 in which the court held that evidence obtained in contravention of the Fourth Amendment was not admissible in court.

This report will focus on crime in Virginia in terms of the nature and trends of crime in the state. According to a report by FBI, the rate of violent crime in Virginia and the [...]

The decision in the recent case of the City of Ontario, California v. The decision by the court puts the issue regarding the right to privacy applicable to individuals in question.

The decision to convict the accused was reversed by the court on the ground that his speech was protected under the First Amendment.

More so, continued empowerment of victims to participate in sentencing process as evidenced from views and observations of many of judges and attorneys is that, it erodes and restricts the ability to try cases and [...]

The above discussed theory of punishment is applied by various administrations to prevent or minimize similar crimes thereby restoring balance in the society.

The Australian justice structure is centered on an elementary belief in the canon of law, justice and the autonomy of the judges.

Intellectual property is treated as information and, therefore, the intellectual property assets can be attributed to the characteristics of public goods. Owners of personal, intellectual and real property are not subjected to the same rights [...]

Legal frameworks on the training of security personnel set the minimum qualifications for persons who are deemed fit to serve in the security firms together with training requirements, licensing requirements, and even qualifications for tutors [...]

Thus, the research on the role of the integrated intellectual property strategies and the effectiveness of specific intellectual property modules for the development of the technology firms is necessary to study the problem in detail.

This case was concerned with the incident of a police officer deciding to search the bag of one of the passengers that was travelling on the bus, despite the fact that the law enforcement representative [...]

As in all contract cases the validity of a contract is one of the essential legal principles that must first be established since a court of law cannot enforce the terms of an invalid contract, [...]

In my opinion, Andrea Yates had problems that might have led her to being an offender, the pregnancy and the number of children she had within the few years of marriage was a major cause.

The court correctly ascertained that the images that Werner Brothers utilized were not similar in any way to the images used on the cover page of the novel.

The main goal is to make it known that the problem is extreme in the rural areas and urge the law enforcement agencies to utilize the existing law to solve the problem.

Attachment is a legal practice through which a court of law, followed by the appeal of a creditor, entitles particular property possessed by the debtor to be reassigned to the creditor, or vended for the [...]

The ACLU iterates that MCSO deputies are in the habit of "sacrificing the rights and well-being of workers in the name of immigration enforcement".

When the police engage in racial profiling mistrust between the public and the police arises. The causes of such mistrust may be due to poor communication between law enforcement individuals and community members due to [...]

Perre, with the other potato growers, litigated Apand for the "economic loss" they had borne owing to the loss of the right of entry to the Western Australian market.

In this case, arresting children is the only way to get rid of child-sex tourists. Therefore, the only effective way of dealing with this problem is to take lawful actions against those involved in child-sex [...]

This paper will discuss the role of the internet in the spread of child pornography. Before the popularity of the internet in the 1980s, child pornography was rare and unheard of.

As a matter of fact, there was no evidence to prove that the inclusion of the implied term in the contract was a professional custom in the insurance sector.

In the ruling, WCJ observed that the injury occurred in the course and context of employment in Cubic Applications Inc, and thus, deserve compensation.

The results of this study showed that the treatment intervention is effective in not only reducing crime and delinquency, but also in minimizing the prevalence of teenage pregnancy and welfare dependency among participants who successfully [...]

I conclude that we are not ready to lift the restrictions, but the improvement of the quality of life in prisons and the control over ethics in research might allow us to consider changes.Dr.

But criminal victimologists continue to investigate the problems of victim-offender interactions, individual characteristics of victims within and outside of the context of a committed crime, relation of victims to latent criminality, etc.

The apparent issue that is related to PB is the fact that it is "outside the shadow of valid law". PB is a valid tool that is being used to maximize the positive outcomes for [...]

Thus, understanding comfort and discomfort will aid the interviewer in uncovering the disguise of an individual that is trying to give untruthful answers to simple questions posed by the interviewer.

The study also assesses the significance of the chapter, critically evaluates the content, and makes a proposition of a present theory being expanded to tackle and give details of the rising and future inclinations as [...]

It is the assumption of this paper that a baby market may be a better alternative to the current system that often does not meet demand and contributes to instances of abortion due to the [...]

Exchange, on the other hand, refers to the promises made by both parties in the process of fulfilling the requirements of the contract.

It is imperative to mention that the prominence of wrongful convictions in a topic that is frequently discussed by scholars and has led to many disagreements.

In such a way, the differences in the research study, as well as formulating a research question affect the degree to which group, mailed, face-to-face, telephone, and web research can have certain advantages over the [...]

Law enforcement agencies need to have specific protocols that assess psychological needs of all police officers who are likely to be involved in shootings.

The researchers failed to indicate the distinct and important sections such as the study objectives, research questions, and the significance of the study.

One of the reasons for the selection of this theory is that it looks into the influence of crime through poverty in the urban cities such as in Canada and the people who undertake criminal [...]

At the onset of the industrial revolution, public awareness concerning the fair and ethical treatment of children in workplaces emerged. The role of supervising and guiding children is left to other children, grandparents, or hired [...]

The salon will be strategically located in Oregon, US, and will specialize in the provision of hair care and styling services.

It is not a secret that health insurance is one of the most sensitive topics in the workplace, as employees are insured with the help of employer-sponsored medical insurance every year.

Second, employers should be allowed to hire replacement workers not only to maintain the balance of relative bargaining power between the companies and the labor unions but also to reduce labor costs.

That is beside the requirements outlined in the act on how organizations should implement and comply with each section of the act to adhere to the law.

The benefits of adopting the act form the specific area of study, leading to the question of, what benefits inspired corporate entities to adopt the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?

Although the health care law adds benefits to assist in making the Medicare prescription drug coverage more affordable upon reaching the Medicare Part D coverage gap, vulnerable populations have often fallen into what is commonly [...]

The role of the Department of Juvenile Justice is to use appropriate approaches that have the potential to support the needs of every child.

In the case of Sally, her employment contract should also contain the information about the probation period specifying that it will be at the start of employment and as a trial period for three months. [...]

As such, it focused on determining whether the two provisions in the CDA criminalizing the display of 'obscene' and 'patently offensive' online materials violated the First Amendment. That is, the constitutionality of the law restricting [...]

This way, the staff will be able to understand the values of the organization and the consequences of not conforming to the values.

The treatment for both is also set accordingly a violent offender is taught to control emotions and practice techniques that help analyze the degree of stress, while a sexual offender is meant to change the [...]

Public records are quite reliable when police officers need to verify information gathered from a scene of the crime, as well as streamline the whole process.

The tax of the $11,000 fees paid to the attorney by Sarah is a fixed amount hence no deductions will be made on the value.

It is the responsibility of any government to ensure that each and every employee is satisfied with the conditions of work so that the employee can deliver to the maximum.

The following paper addresses the Act from the perspective of its constitutionality, the measures applicable to judges caught in misconduct and the terms of judges' removal, as well as the terms of appointment.

For example, if a person has a bank account in a particular state, then he or she is under the jurisdiction of this state's court.

This discussion examines the issue of whether some powers of the Congress should be given to individual states and whether states' powers comprising the health, welfare, and morality of the people should be addressed to [...]

In other words, it is believed to be critical that the power capacity is equally spread within the country, and the minority has the same right to shape the decision making process as the majority.

This case was rather complicated, and it started with the class action suit that was filled by twenty children who did not receive an opportunity to enter the school that was near their homes because [...]

The primary purpose of the paper is to provide the in-depth analysis regarding a possible decision made by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the case Brown v.

Therefore, the court also considered the other aspects of the given case and initiated the deep investigation of the concerns related to the relations between Ms.

The initial version of the United States Constitution included the provisions that granted authority to the three independent branches of government: the legislative, the judicial, and the executive.

The paper would discuss the incidence of corruption in the workplace. In her locker, she had left the names of the officials she was working with in her scheme.

The police officer had the choice to take the children to a juvenile center home and arrange for a person to take care of the baby and then take the woman to jail as she [...]

One of the core aspects that should not be disregarded is that such programs may be used as a particular assessment tool that would help to identify needs of a juvenile, and this approach may [...]

Stewart was aware that the information she had been given by Faneuil about the sale was in contravention of the duties of confidence and trusted the stockbroker owed to the company and its clients.

It is necessary to add that people already have a negative view of the defendant as he is a representative of the pharmaceutical industry, which is seen as unfair and corrupted.

That is why it is now illegal for the officers to conduct a warrantless search if they are convinced that any time wastage would jeopardize their ability to succeed in making an arrest.

To analyze the mechanism of rehabilitation system, this research will study the reasons for the difficulties in reintegration, the methods of facilitating it, and the relationship between the two aspects.

The states elaborate and adopt the laws meant to fight organized crime and gangs and prevent their violence. As well as in the criminal organizations, the gangs are constituted of leaders and their subordinates.

It is necessary to understand that a defense attorney would get a lot of valuable information during the intake hearing, and would have a better understanding of a particular case and expectations of the client.

The use of developmental theories in the design of crime prevention programs can be viewed as a significant breakthrough and an essential step forward as it permits the design of a set of correct behavioral [...]

There are three parties involved in the situation: the victim, the offender, and the company. At the same time, the involvement of Police Officers to the case and the necessity to carry out their daily [...]

First and foremost, one should note that one of the most typical ethical concerns in the relevant field is the cases of discrimination on the ground of the national origin.

The difference between the powers of an intake officer and a juvenile judge is that a judge decides in court while an intake officer supervises the process of rehabilitation.

Access to such a database should only be for law enforcement and members of the criminal justice system since juveniles should not be considered under the same criminal classification as adults due to the potential [...]

That is why this paper's objective is to explore different views on how the factors of race and culture can influence the violent and criminal behavior in people, to analyze the evident correlations between the [...]

According to the results of the cross-examination, Lisa did not have problems with perceiving reality: at the moment of the crime, she knew that she was killing a woman to cut the child out of [...]

Under common law, the definition of hire purchase is to the effect that the buyer hires the goods for a price with an option of purchasing the goods or terminating the agreement.

To understand the applications of the ETOPS rule, it is important to have a review of its evolution over the years.

It was revealed that his parents tried to intervene and stop the rampage, but Rodger could not hear any of it.

The first issue to pay attention to is the sexual misconduct involving the police officer and the crime victim. Two internal investigations were initiated to determine whether the sexual misconduct was observed in relation to [...]

Speaking about the given issue, it is important to give the clear definition of this category and determine who could be judged by the juvenile court.

Despite the fact that RICO act had the great impact on the development of this sort of crime, there is still the necessity to struggle against it and introduce various defense practices.

Given the fact that PRPs and DPs are the variants of rehabilitation programs, their correlation is understandable, but their targets determine their differences.

Police also inform the suspects that they have the right to an attorney that will be provided to them by the state if they cannot afford one.

They believe that the negative implications of the criminal world, on the whole, are transmitted to the activity of criminal justice workers that creates an unfavorable association of the latter in the mind of the [...]

Safety on the roads is received the highest priority for the government as the growing number of accidents because of fatigue of the truck drivers prove the significance of the issue.

In the overviewed case, the abuse of criminal justice is evident since it is prohibited for the public officials, who are engaged in the investigation, to peer in the confidential affairs of the clients as [...]

It is necessary to understand that this is a significant problem that needs to be addressed because children are likely to participate in activities that are against the law when they are not under supervision.

To identify all the facts of the situation, it is necessary to mention the properties of marijuana. Therefore, it seems logical for Dale to report the situation in the hopes that a just decision will [...]

To my firm belief, utilitarian ethical system is more advantageous than the systems proposed by libertarianism and determinism since it accepts human nature and puts the general safety above the individual good.

The second key event took place in 2012 when after the decision of the social worker to close the case and place the complete responsibility on the victim without the support of the corresponding authorities [...]

He likens police work to sports because it requires officers to be highly dedicated to their duties. Police officers need to acquire advanced skills to help them deal with different crimes that happen in areas [...]

Jones case, the placement of a GPS device under a suspect's car was interpreted as a violation of the Fourth amendment by the Supreme Court. In the United States v.

Therefore, the main purpose of this project is to explore the types of dilemmas and the factors that affect the workers response to the dilemmas in a workplace.

Moreover, a prosecutor also needs to prove that the accused had the intent to act, or go through with the plan, and the intent to kill, and not merely maim or disfigure the victim.

The present paper examines three important decisions issued by the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights in the field of state responsibility, human rights, and rights and duties of international [...]

In the case under consideration, the police arrested the judge. The right to be represented by the attorney is another part of the Miranda Rights.

As evident from the explanation above, the charges in the current case, that is, breach of peace, constitute a misdemeanor and not a felony.

However, this definition is because of a long evolution process over the years since the rise of the anti-rape movement in the United States in the 1970s.

In the case of Yourprop's desk, the company has a master key to it, so the search can be conducted warrantlessly.

The other components of the crime prevention program at the institution include the existence of a campus security authority and a memorandum of understanding with the law enforcement authorities.

The primary aim of academic ethics is to develop the understanding of the adverse effects of dishonesty. The next step refers to the evaluation of the found sources and planning of the paper.

This development has caused some legislators to question whether it is right for the federal government to continue funding the organization because it is unlawful for the government to finance abortion services.

In this case, it is necessary to pay vehement attention to the environmental policies since they contribute to the efficient utilization and minimization of waste, sufficient distribution of the company's resources, the motivation of the [...]

In this case, the directors who facilitated the authorization of the illegal allocation of the dividends would incur the liability of paying the money to the business entity.

The functions of the law may be termed differently, but the key principles would be more or less the same: the primary role of the law is to maintain the stability of the system by [...]

Although the test is considered to be fairly self-sufficient and accurate, the presence of the group in question is essential to the approval of the test results.

In other words, a psychological assessment of Bill, the person accused of a first-degree murder, is crucial to the fairness of the trial and the feasibility of the verdict to be passed.

The idea of updating the current justice system so that it could incorporate the elements of correction can be viewed as rather reasonable; however, when it comes to the execution of the specified concept, the [...]