Law Essay Examples and Topics. Page 8

The doctrine of equitable estoppel acts as a rule of evidence where matters in contention can be proved by demonstrating to the court how the rule applies in the circumstances of the case.

Whenever a police tries to stop a motorist and the motorist decides to disobey the order of the police officer and evades, the police can initiate a pursuit.

The system of courts is structured in a way that both the innocent and the guilty have a chance to be heard.

It is also reported that in the year 2004, seven percent of the State inmates in the United States jails and eighteen percent of the Federal prisoners pointed out that they engaged in committing offenses [...]

Consequently, the main goal of JCPP is to make the youth aware of the importance of the education system, how harsh prison life is, and also engage them in different physical activities.

Governments in Australia and all over the world try to protect the environmental damage through the introduction of environment-related laws and regulations. In Australia, the State, Commonwealth, and the local governments introduce and administers legislation [...]

The aim of forensic facial reconstruction is to use a skull to build a face that can be used to recognize the person to whom the skull belongs.

Contract Administration involves those activities undertaken by government officials after a contract has been awarded to do evaluation on how well the government and the contractor performed in order to meet the goals of the [...]

In the case of land, if Andy decides to revoke the contract for the sale, he must return the payment he had received for the land.

This is owed to the fact that Christie lacks the necessary documentation that she could present to the court to support her claim that she was rightly paying the $175.

Training and counseling of the youth on a career is important in preventing juvenile violence and delinquent behaviors related to gang activities.

Thus, it is important to device a method of investigation that may enhance the preservation and maintenance of the integrity of the evidence.

In this case, John failed to fulfill his share of the contact thus Chen has this as a basis of not paying the high labor cost, the case says "John builds the extension but does [...]

In the United States, civil litigation takes place in normal courts however it is strictly guided by formal and exhaustive rules of civil procedures; one rule that has been adopted in the system is civil [...]

On top of the list of some of the renowned companies within this state are companies which are in the transport sector.

Offenders have a strong incentive in being members of the Drug Court in that they have the prospect of avoiding being in jail for as long as they abide by the rules and cooperate in [...]

The characteristics of Godse, the motive, and his actions will be looked at to establish the conditions of the case. On that day, Gandhi was getting prepared to unveil his plans to the congress, and [...]

The term Noble Cause Corruption refers to a crime-fighting sub-culture that involves the law enforcement members being engaged in activities that would otherwise be considered criminal or unethical for the purposes of the greater good [...]

Burglary, in contrast, is a property crime in that the offenses are categorized as criminal activities against property and do not have to involve harming another person. It is vital to distinguish the intention of [...]

The present paper aims to examine the links between gender and crime through an analysis of a sexual assault case. Identification of crime patterns is a valuable tool to guide criminologists as it helps them [...]

It is easy for the prosecution, in this case, to request the judge to sentence the defendant due to her criminal behavior.

The fact that violence is extremely widespread in gang members' everyday life and the need to protect themselves from rivals result in the prevalence of firearms among gangsters. It should be noted that the internal [...]

In particular, the court had to decide if the athletic activities of this person could be regarded as a form of business.

The Assembly Bill is designed to reconstruct the approach towards the disposition of funds directed at covering healthcare services for the indigent groups of people since some of these individuals receive opportunities to be covered [...]

This implies that one party should be willing to give the contract and the other party should be ready to take the contract.

The parties involved in this case were Elena Sturdza who was the complainant and appellant, and the United Arab Emirates Federal Government, et.al who were the defendants.

A charge bargain occurs in situation where a prosecutor offers the accused an opportunity to plead to a lesser charge or in situation where the accused has a number of charges to plead guilty to [...]

This paper will highlight the effects of contraband in the prison system and some of the steps being taken to control the issue.

This issue is particularly relevant to the functioning of medical institutions that have to ensure the rights of patients. Thus, it is necessary to introduce a set of safeguards can minimize the risks of the [...]

The corporate finance defines the life and death of a corporation. Implementation of the corporate law has created a favorable environment for businesses to thrive.

The moment a guest has checked into a room or ordered food or drink in a hospitality outlet, he or she is entitled to self and luggage security by law and has the right to [...]

It refers to circumstances where crime intervention efforts make the cost of committing an offense greater than the benefits accruing from the crime.

This paper draws the theories discussed herein from a radical orientation; they include radical, feminist and critical criminology theories and present principles that alter the existing and traditional views on the development of criminal behaviour [...]

Most critiques express doubt as to the relevance of application of the Act in the modern system, given that a number of clauses seem to be a problem1.

Tonry's goals of explaining the main underlying processes of American penal policymaking and the adverse effects of irrational decisions driven by the moral panic and the politicians' inclination of gaining authority among the potential voters [...]

The module started by introducing intellectual property and relating its significance to companies in terms of ownership of their creations as well as the benefits that come from such creations.

In addition, it is necessary to edit the research question/hypothesis after reviewing the literature and determining variables; select the research method; sampling methods and control of variables should be thoroughly explained as well; description of [...]

The rubric for measuring judicial activism is wide and well elaborated in a continuum of dealings by federal judges such as wrong interpretation of accepted methodology, using a policy that is substantive, adjusting interpretations and [...]

For example, if a person agrees to repair another's house for $1000, and takes $700 before the job, and then gets another job offer and fails to repair the house, the owner of the house [...]

The nature of dilemma facing me as an investigator is of the employment of the moral, personal, and psychological guidelines instilled in me as an individual versus what is stipulated by the police department, where [...]

In this case we need to clearly understand whether the intent to enter into this contract is of a nature that can be termed as legally enforceable or it was just a family relationship between [...]

There has been influencing by the government on police operations and this has weakened the independence of the department in its attempts at internal controls.

The legal process involves the police, who are responsible for investigating crimes and making the arrest of the offenders. Punishment of offenders is also meant to rehabilitate the individuals to abandon the old habits and [...]

The argument advanced by conflict theorists states that the many laws imposed on street offenders are mainly to be the gain of the elites.

According to Karl Marx, the capitalist control the economy they control the means of production and others were the laborers in the farms of the wealthy. The perpetrators are usually people who are in power [...]

To investigate the Pros and Cons of this profession aims, and attitudes of police officers I conducted the interview with two police officers from different departments and of different ages.

The same brokers are responsible in mediating deals and ways of transferring to the countries that are referred to as not stable or even to terrorist organizations and gangs deemed to be dangerous to the [...]

The inquisitorial system was pioneered by the Roman Catholic Church in the medieval era, where the church used this system in its religious courts for prosecution of offenders and to reform the former system which [...]

In this case, it can be seen from Kitty's case that she would have not died; in case the police had been called in time or if the witnesses volunteered to rescue her.

This is one of the provisions that force the company to take responsibility for the damage or loss of the goods.

Economic crime is a serious problem for the business world, and it has become more and more aggravating with the development of technologies and with the growing availability of internet access.

The currently available valuation methods of Intellectual Property can be grouped into three categories, which are the market approach, the cost approach and the income approach.

1954 Sheridan Holmes was born SH; 1957 Ryan Williams, former Behman Brothers manager, was born RW; 1974 Fran Ashcott started working as an English Professor at Bartroom College FA; 1976 Mickey Pennman became a [...]

The level of education and the level of poverty prove that the criminology of Asian people is on the lower level than in other countries.

Chem who is a new customer to the business entered into a contract with Barkley on the belief that he is in the position of authority.

Consequently, the refugee policy comes about due to the flow of obligations courtesy of the 1960 UNHCR Convention, that is to say, the provision of refugees' protection.

O'Shea states the following fact in his research: "The length of the prison term depends upon multiple factors including the severity and type of the crime, state and/or federal sentencing guidelines, the convicted person's criminal [...]

Additionally, it has been hoped that private international law is the best means to alleviate complex issues in disputes such as those involving the use of the Internet.

This is where the judicial activism came about whereby even if it is not the duty of the judges to make a law, they can use the law to fit in a new situation.

The "Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act " was intended to give security to all American workers and enhancing easy to access, good quality and informed health insurance cover.offer protections for millions of American workers [...]

Research showed individuals' attitudes toward crime may herald their criminal behavior, in agreement with criminological theories such as control theory, learning theory and psychological theories like the theory of reasoned action.

When it comes to studying a case of crime, no matter the level of severity, nothing is more important to a criminal investigator than the use and implementation of forensic science.

McDonald's case, who asserts that McDonald's was 80% to blame for the damages that Mrs. McDonalds was adamant that the cases were trivial and this shows the firm's disregard of customer safety.

This essay dwells on the definition and importance of MPAs, including the ones in the high sea. The goal of the alliance is to bolster international collaboration and exchange of knowledge.

Levco rejected to execute arbitration in Ohio and passed a statute that allowed them to void out the state arbitration. The court established that CCI demonstrated, as a matter of law, the presence of a [...]

The preceding level of severe felonies in the United States was critical, and the community considered the three strikes laws enrollment a necessity.

The main idea of a minimum sentence is to restore moral justice and set a proportional punishment for a first-degree arson.

According to Holmes and Holmes, the majority of child predators "had some form of child pornography in their possession at the time of arrest".

In addition, the accuracy of determining latent fingerprints is related to both the professionalism of experts and the context and motivation of his or her work; hence, the examiner cannot claim the absence of errors [...]

Some people believe that copyright infringement of information in the internet do not have weight as compared to the information in the traditional printed world.explains that one of the reasons why we should guard copyright [...]

The chances of prosecuting a case rest primarily of the ability of criminal investigators to present admissible evidence in the court.

Despite the subsequent governments emphasizing that people should stick to the established laws, it has been found that there has been an emergence of unjust laws in the country which aims at enforcing the poor [...]

The level of accuracy that the data collected holds cannot be 100%; there is a level of error that affects the reliability of the data collected.

They are very important in the proceedings and even have additional authority to propose a waiver of the subject. The judges are the other officials in a juvenile court system.

The two approaches to criminal justice are in a normative state and there is always a risk of seeing one or the other as better or worse depending on the application.

The theory, also known as the Sociobiology or Psychobiology is the focus of this essay which also dwells on some recommended responses for the Criminal Justice System in dealing with criminal behavior.

The fourth task of crime investigators in crimes against children is that their work should be able to facilitate effective decision-making and disclosures.

Defamation cases in Australia are said to be too expensive in terms of time, reputation and money. Defamation cases in Australia are said to be too expensive in terms of time, reputation and money.

In addition, the arrest can be made without a warrant if, a person commits the offense in the presence of a law enforcement officer.

The first one is sham prosecutors, overconfident eyewitnesses, lying informants from jailhouses and the inept lawyers and overzealous prosecutors who jeopardize the chances of the accused for fair trials and conviction of the accused prior [...]

Gideon's Trumpet, a book by Anthony Lewis, tells the story of Clarence Earl Gideon, whose case in the Supreme Court changed the judicial system in the United States.

Before attempt to evaluate the current operation of the law of public interest immunity in civil trials it is necessary to discuss the definition of public interest immunity, current situation and the judgement of few [...]

If the law enforcers have voted it in and made sure it is in action the why is the crime rates among the youth taking its toll in the society.

In the overwhelming majority of cases, the teenager who has encountered such problems is inclined to violate the law, which often leads her to illegal and sometimes unsafe abortion. According to WHO, it is the [...]

Thus, this boy is able to hurdle the odds and become the author of the book himself. It is the mode of tuning in to the special needs or interests of the child.

Forensic crime scene investigation currently employs the study of human remains and this also involves extraction of DNA from the tissues for inclusion in the polymerase chain reaction, which is an enzymatic amplification of specific [...]

The practical dissemination of canine investigation activities in law enforcement activities is in sharp contrast with the lack of literature on the issue of requirements for cadaver dogs' activities and training methods.

The statistics suggest that the present rate of school violence is, in fact, lower than the one estimated by the general studies.

At this stage, a child can perform certain actions repeatedly and also be able to differentiate the means of doing actions.

The present paper is designed to use the subculture approach that belongs to the array of ecological theories to explain the emergence of crime in Boyle Heights, composed mostly of citizens of Latino cultural background.

Punishment is a system of power and parameters within a system that are utilized to turn the people of a nation into docile and obedient drones.

As the two fundamental aspects of the marketplace game theory of the corporations, a debate may then be formulated about the authenticity of each in relation to the other.

Therefore, for effective implementation of the defense-in-depth strategy for the protection of assets, it is important to address the following issues: knowing the enemy, understanding the external enemies, defending against an internal enemy, and knowing [...]

The first section will describe Consumer Protection Act; the second part will explain the Sales of Goods Act; whereas the third section explains the Supply of Goods and Services Act.

As part of the settlement, both companies agreed to employ an independent technical expert to ensure no Waymo technology is incorporated in Uber's hardware and software.

In this situation, the court considered a case that affected the protection of nature and the human right to own property and sentenced in favor of the state.

Although the cultures of the UK and the US have a lot in common due to the shared historical legacy, the approaches that the legal system within each state uses toward the described information types [...]

The court case of the appellant in the face of the People of the State of New York and the respondent in the face of Bernhard Goetz was argued and decided in the year 1986.

Support of restrictions on foreign ownership of Canadian media companies is based on the affirmation that removal of limitations will make operators not to serve the interests of the public and democracy.

This paper begins by analyzing the history of the USCG and the kind of protection the organization provides to the United States.

In criminology, there are numerous theories to identify the predictors of violence and assaults to help solve and moderate the crimes occurring on campus.

There are several theories that explain the phenomenon of juvenile crime, the Strain Theory being the most common one. The Strain Theory posits that the lack of resources leads to crime and shapes attitudes, normalizing [...]

However, the most common reason for the specified age group to confess to the crimes that they never committed is the lack of techniques for questioning teenagers that can be observed in the modern legal [...]

The fact is that people do not realize that marriage is a hard work and spouses should do their best to support each other and develop their relations. Furthermore, these issues might also result in [...]

In fact, I suppose labor agreement to be the most important for the case as the rules of conduct are formulated in it.

It is also evident that the responsibility of undertaking scene walk-through for evidence and chain of command is equally important based on its capacity to provide the lead investigator with the opportunity to not only [...]

The potential for abuse of the system is evaluated to show the efficiency of the system. Before the introduction of fingerprint identification, police officers relied solely on detailed portraits of people, descriptions of their actions, [...]

The collection of physical evidence through a comprehensive assessment of the crime scene and analysis of forensic evidence is of immense importance by virtue of being the initial step towards the preservation of the forensic [...]

Hence, according to Lopez and Gillespie, tenets of the social disorganization theory have been resourceful in the present-day juvenile delinquency system.

The boot camp programs differ in numerous aspects such as how old the juveniles in the boot camps are and their backgrounds, how strictly the program will follow the military model, the capacity of the [...]

It is a general rule that when an offer is made as was done by B supermarkets, the contract becomes binding the moment an acceptance is made by the offeree.

However, my focus will be on qualitative tools because the nature of my research favors the use of qualitative data collection techniques.

Joe and Lozanne Wamback founded the Canadian Crime Victim Foundation during the summer of 2002. They worked hard to overcome the imbalances in Canada's criminal justice system and provide for victims of crime.

The established gang members, who may be in such associations because they are broke, are offered substitute sources of pay and rehabilitative measures which better their future Should the police be in the schools as [...]

In the case of Terri Schiavo, she had not given such directives, on the other hand, her condition was on brain damage and not the heart thus DNR was not applicable.

In maximizing /minimizing the loss profit incurred, this amount should not be included because the film was not produced so the actual loss caused by Basinger not taking part in the film cannot be traced.

The main defendants were Hoffinger, the manufacturer of the pool linings, and McMaster, the company that sold the liners to the Franks.

The main reason for the enactment of the legislation was to send dangerous criminals to prison to improve the safety of people in communities.

On the contrary, for material to be indecent, it must describe or present sexual content in a manner that that violates the community standards that govern the presentation of such content.

The representatives of the general public got used to the fact that one party is to be punished, and another one is to provide punishment.